Case studies
Illustrative examples on decarbonization measures, costs and regulations
- Alfa Laval
- Alternative Fuels
- Ammonia
- Amsterdam
- Arctic
- Arenared
- Asia
- Australia
- Autonomous
- Ballard
- BAM
- Barge
- Batteries
- Battery Hybrid
- Bio-methanol
- Biodiversity
- Biofuels
- Blog
- Bluewater
- BP
- Bulk Carrier
- Carbon Capture
- Case Study
- Cavotec
- CCS
- China
- Clean Shipping Act
- Climeon
- CMA CGM
- Cobalt
- Combination Carrier
- Container Ship
- Corvus
- COSCO
- Cruise passenger
- Damen
- Decarbonizer
- Decarbonizer case study
- Digitalization
- Dredging
- Econowind
- Ecospeed
- Electrification
- Energy Major
- Engine
- ENI
- EOPSA
- Equinor
- EU
- EU ETS
- Exhaust gas
- FAME
- Feeder
- Fishing
- Flind
- Floating Solar
- Fossil Fuels
- Fuel Cost Calculator
- FuelEU
- FuelEU Maritime
- Full Electric
- Gas Carrier
- GE
- General Cargo
- GoodFuels
- Green Hydrogen
- Hapag-Lloyd
- Harbor Tug
- HBE
- Heerema
- Hull Coating
- Hullvane
- HVO
- Hybrid
- Hydrogen
- IMO
- Industry
- Inland Waterways
- Inland Waterways General Cargo
- Inland Waterways Tanker
- InnovationQuarter
- Japan
- Knutsen
- Kongsberg
- KVNR
- Liquefied Gas Carrier
- LNG
- LNG Carrier
- LPG Tanker
- Maersk
- Maritime Battery Forum
- MDO
- Metasorbex
- Methanol
- Microgrids
- Miscellaneous
- Mobilyze
- Movie
- MSC
- Neste
- Netherlands
- North Star
- NorthVolt
- Norway
- NOx
- Ocean Sun
- Offshore
- Offshore Charging
- Offshore Construction Vessel
- Offshore Support Vessel
- Ore Carrier
- Ørsted
- Passenger Ship
- Plastic
- Port / Tugs
- Port of Auckland
- Port of Rotterdam
- Ports
- Project BOEI
- Provincie Zuid-Holland
- Pusher Tug
- Q&A
- QuantumScape
- Recycling
- RFNBOs
- Rijkswaterstaat
- Ro-Ro Ships
- Rotterdam
- Rules and Regulations
- Semi-Submersible
- SFC
- Shell
- Shipping Company
- Shore Battery
- Shore Power
- Shorelink
- Singapore
- Skoon
- Smart Vessel Optimizer
- Solar PV
- Solid-State Lithium
- Sparky
- Steel
- Stillstrom
- Subsea Industries
- Synthetic Fuel
- Talk with an Expert
- Tanker
- Tanker/Bulk Carrier
- Techbinder
- Techno-Economic Guide for Ship-Based Carbon Capture
- TotalEnergies
- Trailing Hopper Suction Dredger
- Trawler
- US
- Van Oord
- Wärtsilä
- Waste heat recovery
- Wattlab
- Wind
- Wind Power
- Yara
- Zero-Emission Vessel
Choosing the right fuel: a brief guide to future prices and compliance costs
This case study analyzes 10 marine fuels using an HFO-equivalent model to determine their full lifecycle costs, including fuel prices and regulatory compliance costs, from 2025 to 2050. The results highlight a critical tipping point in 2040, driven by the FuelEU Maritime regulation increasing carbon intensity reduction targets sharply from 14.5% to 31%. This blog provides shipowners with guidance on how to navigate these evolving cost scenarios and maintain competitiveness to ensure future-proof investments.
FuelEU + EU ETS compliance costs for CMA CGM, Hapag-Lloyd and COSCO
This case study calculates and compares EU ETS and FuelEU compliance costs for three major shipping companies: CMA CGM, Hapag-Lloyd and COSCO. From 2025 until 2050, these three companies will pay a total compliance cost of $54B (CMA CGM), $25B (Hapag-Lloyd) and $32B (COSCO).
Compliance costs of VLSFO vs. bio-methanol vs. e-ammonia
This case study calculates and compares the compliance costs with regards to EU ETS and FuelEU for VLSFO, bio-methanol and e-ammonia. Results show that the averaged compliance costs for VLSFO between 2025 and 2050 are $966 per mT.