Case studies
Illustrative examples on decarbonization measures, costs and regulations
Hapag-Lloyd
- 5000 GT +
- Alfa Laval
- Alternative Fuels
- Ammonia
- Amsterdam
- Arctic
- Arenared
- Asia
- Australia
- Autonomous
- Average Shore Power Demand
- Ballard
- BAM
- Barge
- Batteries
- Battery Hybrid
- Battery Hybrid Single Engine Tool
- Bio-methanol
- Biodiversity
- Biofuels
- Blog
- Bluewater
- BP
- Bulk Carrier
- Carbon Capture
- Case Study
- Cavotec
- CCS
- Chemical Tanker
- China
- Clean Shipping Act
- Climeon
- CMA CGM
- Cobalt
- Combination Carrier
- Compliance Cost Calculator
- Container Ship
- Corvus
- COSCO
- Cruise passenger
- Damen
- Decarbonizer
- Decarbonizer case study
- Digitalization
- Dredging
- Drill Rig
- Econowind
- Ecospeed
- Electrification
- Energy Major
- Engine
- ENI
- EOPSA
- Equinor
- EU
- EU ETS
- Europe
- Exhaust gas
- FAME
- Feeder
- FincoEnergies
- Fishing
- Flind
- Floating Solar
- Fossil Fuels
- Fuel Cost Calculator
- FuelEU
- FuelEU Case Maker
- FuelEU Maritime
- FuelEU Pool Tool
- Full Electric
- Gas Carrier
- GE
- General Cargo
- GoodFuels
- Green Hydrogen
- Hapag-Lloyd
- Harbor Tug
- HBE
- Heerema
- Hoek van Holland
- HSE
- Hull Coating
- Hullvane
- HVO
- Hybrid
- Hydrogen
- ICO Terminals
- IMO
- Industry
- Inland Waterways
- Inland Waterways General Cargo
- Inland Waterways Tanker
- InnovationQuarter
- Japan
- Knutsen
- Kongsberg
- KVNR
- LFP
- Liquefied Gas Carrier
- LNG
- LNG Carrier
- LPG Tanker
- Lunch and Learn
- Maersk
- Maritime Battery Forum
- MDO
- Metasorbex
- Methanol
- Microgrids
- Miscellaneous
- Mobilyze
- Movie
- MSC
- Neste
- Netherlands
- Nextstep
- North Star
- NorthVolt
- Norway
- NOx
- Nuclear
- Ocean Sun
- Offshore
- Offshore Charging
- Offshore Construction Vessel
- Offshore Support Vessel
- Ore Carrier
- Ørsted
- Passenger Ship
- Penalty
- Plastic
- Pooling
- Port / Tugs
- Port of Auckland
- Port of Rotterdam
- Ports
- PosHYdon
- Power Barge
- Power Barge Tool
- Project BOEI
- Provincie Zuid-Holland
- Pusher Tug
- Q&A
- QuantumScape
- Recycling
- RFNBOs
- Rijkswaterstaat
- Ro-Ro Ships
- RoRo Passenger
- Rotterdam
- Rules and Regulations
- Seagoing Tug
- Semi-Submersible
- SFC
- Shell
- Shipping Company
- Shore Battery
- Shore Power
- Shore Power Quickscan
- Shorelink
- Singapore
- Skoon
- Smart Vessel Optimizer
- Sockets Plugs
- Solar
- Solar PV
- Solid-State Lithium
- Sparky
- Steel
- Stena Line
- Stillstrom
- Subsea Industries
- Synthetic Fuel
- Talk with an Expert
- Tanker
- Tanker/Bulk Carrier
- Techbinder
- Techno-Economic Guide for Ship-Based Carbon Capture
- Ten08
- TotalEnergies
- Trailing Hopper Suction Dredger
- Trawler
- US
- Van Oord
- Wärtsilä
- Waste heat recovery
- Wattlab
- Wind
- Wind Power
- Yara
- Zero-Emission Vessel
Case Study,
Regulations,
FuelEU,
EU ETS
Vincent Doedee
Case Study,
Regulations,
FuelEU,
EU ETS
Vincent Doedee
FuelEU + EU ETS compliance costs for CMA CGM, Hapag-Lloyd and COSCO
This case study calculates and compares EU ETS and FuelEU compliance costs for three major shipping companies: CMA CGM, Hapag-Lloyd and COSCO. From 2025 until 2050, these three companies will pay a total compliance cost of $54B (CMA CGM), $25B (Hapag-Lloyd) and $32B (COSCO).
Regulations
Vincent Doedee
Regulations
Vincent Doedee
Overview of Shipping Companies’ Sustainable Ambitions
Four out of the five largest shipping companies have the ambition to be carbon neutral by 2050. Most shipping companies focus on alternative fuels for combustion. Preferred fuels that are currently considered are (bio)LNG and methanol.