Which will be the First Hydrogen-Powered Inland Vessel in Rotterdam?

Summary - A curious coincidence In Rotterdam. Two vessels - a newbuild from Lenten Scheepvaart which is yet to be named and ‘the Maas’ - both claim to become ‘the first hydrogen inland vessel’ in Rotterdam. We have translated their claims from two Dutch news outlets and made a comparison between the two. High costs and high gains, these insights might help you on your hydrogen journey. The race is on for the first hydrogen-powered inland vessel in Rotterdam!


Claim 1 - ‘Newbuild Lenten Scheepvaart’

When - within 2 years

Newbuild Costs - €10M

> Read More

Claim 2 - the Maas

When - December 2021

Retrofit Costs - Unknown

> Read More


Hydrogen, the future of fuels or an expensive pet project?

Let’s put things in perspective. The 135-meter-long freighter ‘Newbuild Lenten Scheepvaart’ will cost ten million euros: twice as much as a 'normal' ship. On top of this, it is stated that hydrogen is up to three times as expensive as diesel. A 4 million euro subsidy is needed to make the entire project (somewhat) economically viable. The Maas has not given away any numbers, but let’s assume for convenience sake the costs are in the same ballpark. What else could we do with this investment?

The battery system installed on the Maas is roughly 500 kWh, which is similar in size as to what is installed on small (and sometimes even large) offshore class vessels. Generalizing grossly, using the rules of thumb from the insights and costs section on batteries from Mr. Sustainability, it can be assumed the costs for this battery system are between €250.000 - €500.000. It could therefore be argued that for the same investment, up to 10 inland vessels could have been made (near) zero emissions by means of batteries. This is however, too gross a comparison. For both batteries and hydrogen, the infrastructure for recharging and bunkering is not taken into account and battery systems require extensive retrofitting on direct-drive vessels (if at all feasible). Besides, the bold move that both the parties above have taken is a learning the industry a lot about hydrogen systems. The motives and actions of Lenten Scheepvaart, Future Proof Shipping and all parties involved are admirable.

Nevertheless this simple exercise should (at least slightly) raise one’s eyebrows when talking hydrogen. Conversely speaking, one could also argue that the additional costs and technical challenges are simply ‘teething issues’ of hydrogen in the energy transition. That could be. Still, if even DNV claims batteries could very soon be coming on the market than can commercially and technically compete with jet fuel for airplanes (!), why are we investing millions (if not billions) into hydrogen? Is hydrogen truly best fit for this purpose?

The current vessel MS Antonie owned by Harm Lenten. With about a hundred meters long and ten meters wide deck, perhaps it would be more cost effective to cover the deck with (flexible) solar panels? A thousand square meters could generate in the order of 230.000 Wp when using panels from Wattlab, a company that is already fitting solar panels on existing inland vessels. There are even panels coming on the market which could triple that power output, though it remains to be seen how well they perform in marine environments.


References & More Stories

Mr. Sustainability - Insights on Hydrogen

Mr. Sustainability - Tesla’s Battery Day from a Maritime Perspective

Rijnmond - Wereldwijde primeur: nieuw binnenvaartschip op waterstof vaart straks over Rotterdamse wateren

Nieuwsblad Transport - Holland Shipyards rust binnenvaartschip uit met brandstofcel

Scheepvaartkrant - ‘Trossen los’ voor onderzoek naar zero-emissie waterstofschip


Ask our community to learn more and get in contact with others developing hydrogen in the offshore industry

Previous
Previous

Introducing Oceanbird – the wind powered cargo vessel

Next
Next

Methanol Hybrid Offshore Working Vessels