Our Vision

A sustainable world and maritime industry means zero zero zero - UNDER DEVELOPMENT

Summary - How does a sustainable world look like according to Sustainable Ships? This blog answers that question. From this world view, we can derive what the role of Sustainable Ships will be and which values guide our decision making in creating this world. For those who have a tight schedule, we can save you some time.

We believe in Zer0. That means Zero Emissions, Zero Waste and Zero Suffering. In order to achieve Zer0, there are five pillars we need to focus on. These are Economy, Energy, Organization, Income and Education. Why do we believe in these grand ideals and why do we believe these can be achieved? It is not just our passion that motivates us. It flows almost naturally from the narratives that we believe in.


The narratives that shape our world and thinking

Everyone believes in certain stories and myths. We all uphold a basic set of assumptions that we believe are needed to make the world go round. For example the belief that the economy needs to grow. Or that 'oil will always be needed'. We challenge certain beliefs and we have a few beliefs of our own. These are the narratives that *we choose to believe in*, in order to make the world a better place. As everything in nature, these narratives change and evolve over time, lest we become obsolete.

We need oil. We do not need fossil fuels.

Electrification is the way.

Collaboration is the way.

Our narratives lead to a very simple dot on the horizon. We call it Zer0.


The vision - Zer0

A sustainable offshore industry consists of a decarbonized, circular industry that provides a sustainable income for the people dedicating their lives to it. That is what we call Zer0. It means zero emissions, zero waste, and zero suffering. It is a simple vision, but it is not easy.

Zero emissions

Decarbonizing the industry and striving for a carbon neutral footprint is one of the pillars of a sustainable offshore industry. Though some argue zero emissions is technically impossible, one could argue the same for zero incidents. Even if it is virtually impossible, is it not morally imperative to strive for it? At Mr. Sustainability, we believe we should not only strive for zero emissions, this can be done by many different technologies including electrification, power-to-gas, carbon capture and storage and wind energy.

Zero waste

A fully circular industry is one of the pillars for a sustainable industry. This would require radical rethinking of the way we work, monetary incentives and implementation of a turntoo model or similar. This means every and all material resources would have to be given back to the supplier we got it from. Just as nature has been doing for billions of years, at Mr. Sustainability we strive for zero waste and a fully circular offshore industry.

Zero suffering

Happy people. Safe people. That’s what we do it for. In the end, we all want to connect to a tribe of like-minded people, a crew that we feel at home with. We feel honoured to be such a home for some people in the offshore industry, and aim to inspire others to create their own tribes, or crew as we like to call it.


The five Pillars

Economy

A society based on endless economic growth is unsustainable. This is becoming more evident every passing day. Not only do we see the rampant environmental destruction brought onto us by ‘the system’, it is fundamentally ‘weird’ at its core. Compare it to nature: every organism, process or physical event strives towards balance, harmony or equilibrium. But not our all-consuming, ever-expanding economy. I never quite understood. Why do we want it to be larger every year? When is our economy big enough? Do we get a ‘game over’ sign at 1000 trillion? How does a ‘better’ economy help us when we destroy the Earth in the process? The limits to our growth have been made perfectly clear since 1972. We know that unlimited economic growth is counter-intuitive and more over, will eventually destroy us. So, what can we do about it?

The solution to this problem is elegant, easy to understand and revolves around a single underlying principle. The power of production and the responsibility of consumption need to be in the hands of the producer of a product, good or service. This means that the producer of a specific item involving a resource is also responsible for getting the resource back. The Earth will be the owner of all material, humans simply use (lease) material for a short period of time. This basic convention creates the proper incentives for the producer to reduce and re-use the amount of material in its product. It is an agreement that will automatically transition us from a linear economy towards a circular economy.

This principle is called the Turntoo Model by Thomas Rau, explained thoroughly in his book Material Matters. Let me give an example to make it easier to understand. I buy myself a bottle of (diet) coke. How come then, when the transaction is made and I buy the cola, all of a sudden the responsibility of recycling and proper waste disposal of the bottle is mine? How come I need to take care of this waste, while I have no say on how it is made? How come the Coca-Cola Company can wash its hands clean from producing thousands of tons of plastic waste annually and the only thing they need to do is print ‘please recycle’ on their cap?

The current economic model is fundamentally wrong in its core with regards to resource management. We need to put the power of production and responsibility in the same hands while acknowledging that we do not ‘own’ a resource. We lease it from the Earth. This principle is one of the most powerful and easiest way to achieve a fully sustainable, circular economy.

Energy

In terms of energy, human beings only need three things: heat, transportation and lighting. That’s it. For thousands of years, we have relied on wood and muscle power to provide us with these needs. We transitioned to more sophisticated pieces of wood, i.e. coal or fossil fuels in general, about 200 years ago. Fossil fuels have traditionally been sold per barrel, tonnes or other type of unit. This is known as an ‘OPEX-based’ model, a process driven by operational expenditure. In less fancy terms: costs are made to ‘get a resource out of the ground’ and sold for a certain price. Such a model works out great as long as you have a relatively fixed trading price of the commodity. It is not so great if the trading price, for whatever reason, becomes negative. In that case, the OPEX-based model is a big disaster. Negative energy prices are quite a common phenomenon in the world of renewables.

Turns out that even for the oil and gas industry, negative prices can be a thing.

The phenomena of negative prices is extremely harmful to an OPEX-based model. The producers of energy not only have to pay consumers in such an event, but also have to pay the costs of extracting energy. What does this all mean exactly? It means that selling energy per barrel is a thing of the past. In order for our energy system to survive, we need to transition towards a system that provides producers, consumers, and investors with clear long-term security and sustainable income. That requires the creation of a sustainable energy system that can withstand system shocks due to an oversupply of cheap energy. To sum things up, we need to transition from an OPEX-based model to a CAPEX-based model.

I actually described such a model in a previous article, the Energy Transition Principles. In this article I called such a model the Energy Mortgage.It is a proposed system in which energy is not sold per barrel, tonnes, kilo-Watt-hours or any unit for that matter. It is a system in which a producer and consumer of energy agree to a long-term contract, at least ten years. A fixed monthly fee is agreed for the entire period, and the consumer is provided with an agreed upon amount of energy for the entire length of the contract. This is exactly the same system as - guess what - regular mortgages for houses that we live in. It is a time-proven financial instrument, perfectly suited to the energy market. It can also be compared to a limitless mobile plan, one in which you do not pay per MB but for ‘limitless’ data.

The energy mortgage system has many benefits for both producers, consumers and investors. All parties involved have long-term security and know exactly what to expect. The producer even has the added benefit of making more profit, if it manages to increase energy efficiency. The investor, which can be the producer too, has a secure and long-term cash flow. Take one of the largest banks in the Netherlands for example, the ABN Amro bank. One might think that most amount of money is made with business transactions. Nothing could be farther from the truth. Roughly 70% of all the profits of the bank (almost 3 billion euro) are made from regular plain-old simple mortgages. With virtually no risk and no overhead, a mortgage is the perfect tool for long-term security and profit. Billions of profit annually, thirty years of predictable cash-flow, all due to a single, time-proven financial instrument. I call that easy money.

Organization

In order for 12 billion humans to thrive in the 21st century, we need to organize our societies in such a way that information is more efficiently managed. Even more important, we need to manage the way disinformation is recognized and processed. The political and organizational frameworks that most societies have at this moment are insufficient to handle the (dis)information posed at the moment. These frameworks date back hundreds of years ago. Most capitalist democracies have their roots in the age of enlightenment and the French Revolution. It has brought us many good things, certainly. But can we honestly say that the current political systems, designed in a time and age where toilets still had to be invented, is the best system available? As I have made clear in a previous article, I believe the answer is a definitive NO.

The System is fundamentally flawed. And we are all in it.

Our current organizational framework is not up to the challenges of the 21st century, the most important being populism and demagoguery on a global scale, backed by disruptive new technologies such as social media. What we can learn from history is that these trends and technologies are nothing new. We have seen it time and again. Societies grow until some form of crisis, internal or external, triggers a system collapse. One of the most common example is the fall of the Western Roman Empire. The Western Societies currently face a potential existential crisis triggered by Covid-19. But it cannot be said that a pandemic is the only reason for collapse, far from it. We have been teetering on the edge of economic disaster for quite some time. Covid-19 simply shows the deep vulnerabilities of the current system.

When society is faced with an existential threat, there are two outcomes. The society adapts into a new form, a new organization, and survives. If not able or willing, it succumbs and dies. It is exactly as Darwin said: it is not the strongest but those most adaptable to change that survive. We too, need to adapt.

In order to future-proof themselves, governments need to transform into decentralized hive-minds (a governmental cloud) that takes the best interests of the entire group into consideration. It is described in full in one of my previous articles, here is a summary. The first step is to provide everyone with a personal Avatar in a Virtual World. This Avatar can be considered the best version of you. A version of you who thinks about your best interest in the long-term, without you even having to think of it. Every Avatar is then connected into a single “Benevolent Dictator Cloud”, where they all communicate instantly with one another. In a way, you could view this Benevolent Cloud as a hive-mind where every person, every individual, is represented by an Avatar in the Virtual. Just as in regular politics, you have a representative of yourself in a large body of other representatives that decide for you. The cloud optimizes for the least amount of suffering for the entire group. The end result? An organizational framework that takes the best interests of every single soul to heart. This Benevolent Cloud is not susceptible to corruption, populism, dogmatism, or short-term perverse incentives. The Cloud is there for you.

Income

Just a few weeks ago, I discussed how a Universal Basic Income could help us achieve more personal freedom and safety. It is an ironic twist of fate that now, in these times of Covid-19 induced crisis, a Universal Basic Income is proposed by many as a measure to mitigate the economic crisis looming above our heads. Both Spain and the Pope have recently endorsed the Basic Income as a measure to support those who need it most in our society. For the one’s who are unfamiliar with it: a Universal Basic Income (UBI) is a periodic payment delivered to each individual, no questions asked. It would be unconditional, automatic and would be a right for everyone in society. Think of it as a pension, but you do not have to be above a certain age to earn it. You simply earn it by existing, just as you earn your other human rights by simply existing.

There are many reasons for implementing a Basic Income. Some have argued that Basic Income increases economic growth because it would sustain people while they invest in education to get interesting and well-paid jobs. Many technologists believe that automation, creating technological unemployment, will make Basic Income a necessity. With rising unemployment rates, poor communities would become more impoverished worldwide. Proponents therefore argue that it could solve many world problems like high work stress and could create more opportunities and efficient and effective work.

The most valid argument for universal basic income to me however, is that it would create real freedom. The freedom to do whatever one “might want to do”. It will provide so many of us, struggling to make ends meet, with a freedom to pursue the things in life that provide meaning to us. This can range from arts, poetry, helping those in need, or simply sitting behind a desk from 9 till 5. You will have full control over your life.

Many people doubt whether a Basic Income is viable, or even affordable. Virtually every reasons against Basic Income can be countered. The reason I personally believe most of us do not want to institute a Basic Income is ideological. Deep down, most of us believe you have to work to earn money. I however consider Basic Income as a right similar to any other Human Right. I see it as an inheritance from our ancestors. Our forefathers and foremothers who have worked and toiled hard for hundreds to thousands of years to make the world better for their children: us. It is now time for us to reap the benefits they have sown. Universal Basic Income is a society-wide retirement scheme that our ancestors have worked hard for. Every one of us earns it.

Education

There is one thing we can be sure of: more disruptions will come in the future. They can be benign and gradual, caused by cultural changes that drive innovation such as ‘Dieselgate’. This event has paved the way for a more anti-fossil fuel stance, leading Volkswagen on a path of electrification. Disruptions can be more catastrophic in nature however, such as the example of self-driving cars. This technology could destroy millions of honest jobs around the world, potentially creating a whole new class of people: the ‘unemployables’.

Whether we like it or not, change has become a constant in our life. Unfortunately, we are ill-equipped to handle this reality because we never learned this in school. Or anywhere for that matter.

Our educational system is woefully inadequate, unable to deal with a world of constant change. We are not provided the skills to be a valuable member of society for our entire life. As an 8-year old, I still remember my primary school teacher telling me that learning multiplication tables was important because we “would not be walking around with a pocket calculator when we are older”. Most of us now walk around with the accumulated knowledge of the world in our pocket in the form of the internet.

The reality is that we cannot prepare our children for their future, because we do not know what it will look like. We can however teach them the skills to learn new skills quickly. Teach them to learn, not teach them specific knowledge. We should invest in the adaptive power of people for them to have the ability to always change their skills when they need to. In practice this would mean that, whenever someone believes his or her job becomes obsolete due to whichever reason, he or she has the ability to re-educate and learn new skills. For example, in the case that truck drivers get slowly displaced by self-driving trucks in the future. With free education, they can re-purpose themselves to become something else. Anything else. Combined with a Universal Basic Income, this would provide humans total personal freedom to be whatever they want to be. A truck driver can become a bar owner or a logistical manager at the truck company for that matter. All we need to do, is grant people access to free education.


Nice vision. So what?

The ones who are more practical and down to Earth are probably scratching their heads and thinking “nice vision, doesn’t work, never gonna happen.” We admit. Visions are just that. Visions. They almost always remain nothing more than an ideal to believe in. Then again, what is life without purpose? What is work without meaning? What else makes you get up in the morning, if not the belief that you are meant for something more?

It is the hard work of passionate people who work together for a common cause that make the world a better place. We believe in this vision because we want to believe in it. We want to make the world better and we see a role we can play in it. What that is, you can find out here.


References

Bertrand Russel - In praise of Idleness

Mr. Sustainability - Redefining Work


Inspiration

Previous
Previous

The Problems

Next
Next

Our Role